Showing posts with label jw grenadier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jw grenadier. Show all posts

Sunday, July 3, 2016

Media Jailed for outing "JUDGE"

Wake Up America 
Maybe the Media is staying "SILENT" due to "FEAR"?

Mark Thomason has questioned certain documents and following the law filed the appropriate documents in pursuit of public records, relating to the local Superior Court.  
For doing this Mark Thomason and his attorney  Stookey were arrested.  They were charged June 24 with making a false statement in an open-records request in which he asked for copies of checks “cashed illegally.” Thomason and Stookey were also charged with identity fraud and attempted identity fraud because they did not get Weaver’s approval before sending subpoenas to banks where Weaver and another judge maintained accounts for office expenses. Weaver suggested that Thomason may have been trying to steal banking information on the checks.

The appearance is and what Thomason said he was “doing his job” when he asked for records.




“I was astounded, in disbelief that there were even any charges to be had,” said Thomason, 37, who grew up in Fannin County. “I take this as a punch at journalists across the nation that if we continue to do our jobs correctly, then we have to live in fear of being imprisoned.”
Thomason and Stookey are out on $10,000 bond and have a long list of things they cannot do or things they must do to avoid going to jail until their trials. On Thursday, for example, Thomason reported to a pretrial center and was told that he may have to submit to a random drug test – a condition of the bond on which he was released from jail last Saturday.
Alison Sosebee, district attorney in the three counties in the Appalachian Judicial Circuit, and Judge Weaver say the charges are justified. Weaver said she resented Thomason’s attacks on her character in his weekly newspaper and in conversations with her constituents.



Sunday, June 7, 2015

Torture: The Use of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons


Torture: The Use of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons
May 31, 2012
Learn more about our work challenging solitary confinement - useful links and related resources:
·         Take Action: Pack the Court December 2015
*Updated May 2015*
What is Solitary Confinement?
In the early nineteenth century, the U.S. led the world in a new practice of imprisoning people in solitary cells, without access to any human contact or stimulation, as a method of rehabilitation. The results were disastrous, as prisoners suffered severe psychological harm. The practice was all but abandoned. Over a century later, it has made an unfortunate comeback. Instead of torturing prisoners with solitary confinement in dark and dirty underground holes, prisoners are now subjected to solitary confinement in well-lit, sterile boxes. The psychological repercussions are similar.
 
Today, tens of thousands of individuals across the country are detained inside cramped, concrete, windowless cells in a state of near-total solitude for between 22 and 24 hours a day. The cells have a toilet and a shower, and a slot in the door large enough for a guard to slip a food tray through.  Prisoners in solitary confinement are frequently deprived of telephone calls and contact visits. “Recreation” involves being taken, often in handcuffs and shackles, to another solitary cell where prisoners can pace alone for an hour before being returned to their cell.

Ever since solitary confinement came into existence, it has been used as a tool of repression. While it is justified by corrections officials as necessary to protect prisoners and guards from violent prisoners, all too often it is imposed on individuals, particularly prisoners of color, who threaten prison administrations in an altogether different way. Consistently, jailhouse lawyers and jailhouse doctors, who administer to the needs of their fellow prisoners behind bars, are placed in solitary confinement.  They are joined by political prisoners from various civil rights and independence movements.
CCR’s Challenges to Solitary Confinement
In May 2012, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit against the state of California for its use of prolonged solitary confinement in the infamous Pelican Bay prison. Ashker, et al. v. Governor, et al., is a federal class action challenging prolonged solitary confinement and deprivation of due process, based on the rights guaranteed under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, at Pelican Bay. The case challenges inhumane, unconstitutional conditions under which thousands of prisoners live. The case argues that ten years or more of solitary confinement cannot be imposed on any prisoner, regardless of his mental health status, and that prisoners must have meaningful notice of the reason for their placement in solitary, and frequent reviews of that status.  While California has implemented major changes to its process for placing and retaining prisoners in solitary confinement in response to prisoner hunger strikes and the litigation, grave rights violations remain at Pelican Bay and other prisons, and the case is set to go to trial in December 2015.
 
CCR’s case against solitary confinement at Pelican Bay is the latest in a long history of challenges to the use of isolation in prisons. In Wilkinson v. Austin, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in support of CCR’s claims that prison officials cannot confine prisoners in long-term solitary confinement in a super maximum prison without first giving them the opportunity to challenge their placement. CCR has engaged in solidarity efforts alongside hunger striking prisoners, as well as engaged in advocacy against the use of isolation in prisons.
Solitary Confinement is Torture
The devastating psychological and physical effects of prolonged solitary confinement are well documented by social scientists: prolonged solitary confinement causes prisoners significant mental harm and places them at grave risk of even more devastating future psychological harm and at times, these harms were found to be permanent or persist even after one was released from solitary.
Researchers have demonstrated that prolonged solitary confinement causes a persistent and heightened state of anxiety and nervousness, headaches, insomnia, lethargy or chronic tiredness, nightmares, heart palpitations, fear of impending nervous breakdowns and higher rates of hypertension and early morbidity. Other documented effects include obsessive ruminations, confused thought processes, an oversensitivity to stimuli, irrational anger, social withdrawal, hallucinations, violent fantasies, emotional flatness, mood swings, chronic depression, feelings of overall deterioration, as well as suicidal ideation.
 
Exposure to such life-shattering conditions clearly constitutes cruel and unusual punishment – in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Further, the brutal use of solitary has been condemned as torture by the international community.
A Growing Human Rights Movement against the Use of Solitary Confinement
Across the United States and the world, there is an emerging movement calling for the end of solitary confinement.
In the U.S., prisoner-led movements have attracted media attention and public scrutiny to harsh conditions of confinement, including overcrowding, the use of isolation, deplorable health conditions, substandard medical care, and the discriminatory and careless treatment of people with mental illnesses. Several prisoner-led hunger strikes have drawn attention to these harsh conditions, including efforts in Georgia, Ohio and California.
International human rights experts and bodies have also condemned indefinite or prolonged solitary confinement, recommended that the practice be abolished entirely and argued that solitary confinement is a human rights abuse that can amount to torture. In August 2011, Juan Mendez, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, concluded that even 15 days in solitary confinement constitutes torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and 15 days is the limit after which irreversible harmful psychological effects can occur. Other independent human rights bodies at the UN have also expressed concern about Pelican Bay prison and the overall use of solitary in U.S. prisons. However, many prisoners in the United States have been isolated for far longer than just 15 days.
Solitary Confinement at the Pelican Bay Security Housing Unit
Opened on December 1, 1989, Pelican Bay State Prison is the most restrictive prison in California and one of the harshest “super-maximum” prisons in the country. The prison was specifically designed to foster maximum isolation. It is one of four Security Housing Units (SHU) operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).
Prior to the hunger strikes, more than 500 of Pelican Bay’s SHU prisoners have been held in solitary confinement in the SHU for over 10 years. Over 78 prisoners have languished in solitary for more than 20 years. Prisoners are detained inside windowless cells, are not allowed to call home and are served substandard or rotten food.

Prisoners are frequently assigned to the SHU without any significant disciplinary record; instead they are designated for indefinite solitary confinement based on their alleged gang affiliation.  They can be labeled “gang members” for waiving hello to another prisoner who has already been so-designated, or for possession of artwork, or even the subject of their tattoos.

Until recently, the only real way out of the SHU was to “debrief,” to inform on other prisoners, thus condemning other prisoners to the same torture, and risking retaliation.  In response to the prisoner’s organizing, California has now created a “step down program” which allows prisoners placed in solitary for gang affiliation to earn release to general population after spending 3-4 years in solitary without any gang-related activity, so long as they take part in mandatory journaling and other programming.  While many states have implemented step down programs, California’s requires longer in solitary than any other state, and is being imposed upon prisoners who have already spent a decade in solitary, misconduct free.
The California Hunger Strikes
In 2011 and again in 2013, prisoners across California organized coordinated hunger strikes in protest of inhuman and degrading conditions of confinement and outlined five core demands: (1) end group punishment; (2) abolish the use of debriefing; (3) end long-term solitary confinement and alleviate conditions in segregation, including the provision of regular and meaningful social contact, adequate healthcare and access to sunlight; (4) provide adequate food; and (5) expand programming and privileges.
Though CDCR convinced the prisoners to suspend the strike by promising change, the resulting reforms have not gone far enough, and CDCR has punished the hunger strike leaders with prison discipline and other retaliation.
TAKE ACTION AND GET INVOLVED:
1. Pack the Court December 2015Learn more here.
Pelican Bay SHU prisoners have organized to combat cruel conditions of confinement, and have launched hunger strikes in order to raise attention to their demands. The CDCR must honor the Pelican Bay SHU Prisoners’ Demands.
Attachments 
Last modified 
June 1, 2015
The bigger picture
Spread the word
·          Tweet
·          Share
·          Email
Top of Form
Get the latest
Email*
Bottom of Form
Support CCR
Join us on the front lines for social justice
·         $70
·         $150
·         $350
·         $600
·         $1000
DONATE
·         What We Do
o    Issues
o    Cases
·         How We Work
·         Who We Are
·         Get Involved
·         Press Center
·         Bertha Justice Institute
·         Blog
·         Donate
666 Broadway
7th Floor
New York, NY 10012
Telephone: 212-614-6464
Fax: 212-614-6499
CONNECT WITH US
·          
·          
·          
Top of Form
GET THE LATEST


Email* 

Monday, February 16, 2015

Plight of former TN Deputy Sheriff Mark Lipton - This can happen to anyone in America

Lipton Synopsis:




TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,                                                                   May 29, 2012

ISSUES WITH MY CASE, SOME YEARS AGO I CONDUCTED A TRAFFIC STOP THAT INVOLVED THE SHERIFF RON SEALS FRIEND (GERALD MILLER A WEALTHY MAN) HE WAS INVESTIGATED BY THE T.B.I  AND CLEARED DUE TO COVERED UP EVIDENCE.DWAIN JOHNSON HEAD AGENT CAN FILL YOU IN 865-549-7800 THIS TRAFFIC STOP WAS EVEN TAKEN OUT OF THE COMPUTER BY THE SHERIFF LIKE IT NEVER HAPPENED I TOOK A POLYGRAPH ON THIS AND PASSED IT TOO! (SEE POLYGRAPH)

A FEMALE CAME FORWARD WITH INFO ON THE ABOVE INCIDENT JUST RECENTLY AND THE F.B.I AGENT KT HARPER WITH THE KNOXVILLE OFFICE WAS RECENTLY LOOKING INTO THESE MATTERS HE FELT HE HAD THE NEEDED INFO TO RE-OPEN THE ABOVE CASE DUE TO THE COVER UP. HIS CELL NUMBER 865-740-3799
ON NOV 16 2009 WE TRIED TO GET A WARRANT AND WAS TOLD TO RETURN THE NEXT DAY THE 17TH DUE TO A POLICE REPORT NOT BEING READY, ON THE 17TH WE WERE TURNED AWAY AND TOLD I WAS UNDER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION A DAY AFTER ONSCENE POLICE DECIDED NOT TO MAKE ANY ARRESTS AND SAID THE MATTER WAS A PRIVATE PROSECUTION NOBODY WAS ARRESTED. WE WERE THE FIRST TO SEEK WARRANTS AT ABOUT 930 AM THE ACCUSER THEN WAS ALLOWED AT 6PM TO GET HIS WARRANT AND I WAS ARRESTED NO INVESTIGATION FILE EXISITS OTHER THAN JUST STANDARD INCIDENT FORMS. IT WAS A STALL TACHTIC TO HOLD ME AT BAY I EVEN HAVE A TAPED 

CONVERSATION THAT THE CHIEF OF DETECTIVES SAID I WASN’T GOING TO BE CHARGED. (HAVE AUDIO ON CELL PHONE WILL TO YOU) I  EVEN WENT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL JIMMY DUNNS OFFICE AND LEFT A MESSAGE THAT I WAS JUST REFUSED A WARRANT TO CALL ME HE TO DATE NEVER HAS.
DURING MY 2009 DIVORCE A LAWYER NAMED MRS FELICIA WHITE SAID AS WE EXITED THE COURT HOUSE SHE HAS NEVER SEEN A JUDGE ACT THAT WAY TOWARD AN INDIVIDUAL (ME) SOMEONE HAS GOT TO HIM IN REGUARDS TO YOUR TRAFFIC STOP HER NUMBER IS 865-577-1644.

DURING THE NOV 2009 INCIDENT MY ATTORNEY AND I PROVED TO THE ASST DA GEORGE IOANEDESE  THAT HIS CLIENT GAVE FALSE TESTIMONY AS TO WHO HE WAS WITH THAT DAY IN HISTORY UNDER OATH TO HIM HE OFFERED A DISMISSAL  ON DEC 6 2011  IF HE FOUND OUT IT WAS FALSE. HE VERIFIED THE SAME FACTS 2 TIMES WITH THE WITNESS HIS CLIENT NAMED FALSELY AND THEN WITHOUT REASON FAILED TO GIVE US THE DISMISSAL AS PROMISED AND ALLOWED HIS CLIENT TO TESTIFY KNOWINGLY TO FALSE INFORMATION TO THE JURY. (SEE LETTERS BETWEEN LAWYERS)

THE MANS DAUGHTER AND WIFE WERE ON PROBATION DURING MY ATTACK FOR DEALING DRUGS AND NOTHING WAS EVER DONE.

THE MAN HENRY SUTTON IS UNDER INVESTIGATION WITH TN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FOR FRAUD\TAX EVASION CHIEF AGENT DAVID REMKEE 615-365-6200 HE IS ALSO BEING LOOKED AT BY THE INVESTIGATORS OF D.H.S  INVESTIGATOR RICHARD CARR 865-594-6060 ASK FOR HIM AT EXT 1268 ALSO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL IS LOOKING INTO FRAUD MATTERS AGENT KC DUNAVAN 615-687-7264.

THE MAN CLAIMED HE WAS STRUCK WITH MY GUN AND RECEIVED INJURY NO D.N.A WAS EVER TESTED DESPITE THE EVIDENCE PEOPLE 2 OF THEM BEING TRAINED IN THE DNA FIELD BY THE UT FORENSIC ACADEMY.

MY LAWYER SAID HE WAS HAVING TROUBLE SLEEPING AND FELT SOMETHING MAY HAVE BEEN TAINTED DAVID WIGLER 865-546-7746 HE TOO HAD A POLICE OFFICER CHANGE HIS TESTIMONY ON THE STAND WHEN HE QUESTIONED HIM MOMENTS BEFORE IN THE HALLWAY AS TO HOW HE RECEIVED MY GUN AND WHAT HE DID WITH IT. THAT OFFICER IS NOW WORKING A CUSH JOB IN MY COUNTY FOR HIS DECEPTIVE TESTIMONY I WEEK AFTER MY TRIAL AND AFTER LEAVING TO WORK SOMEPLACE ELSE BEFORE MY COURT DATE HE WAS ALLOWED TO RETURN.

THE ACCUSERS FAMILY WAS ALLOWED TO TELL THE JURY THE WERE FALSELY ASSAULTED DESPITE HAVING NO WARRANTS AGAINST ME *SEVERAL LAWYERS HAVE SAID THAT IS A RULE 404-B VIOLATION IN ITSELF AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED.

 THE JUDGE DESPITE HAVING A COPY OF MY PASSED POLYGRAPH STILL HARSHLY SENTENCED ME AND DID NOT CONSIDER JUDICIAL DIVERSION DUE TO MY MAINTAINING MY INNOCENSE AND NOT SHOWING MUCH REMORSE HE EVEN SAID DURING THE TRIAL THE STATE HAD MANY DISCREPENCIES IN ITS TESTIMONY WHICH MANY PEOPLE HEARD THE JUDGE COMMENT ON THIS. (CAN PROVIDE NAMES IF NEEDED)

**IF YOU LISTEN TO THE 911 TAPES I AM ATTACKED 1ST SO WHETHER OR NOT ANY OF THIS EVER HAPPENED HOW COME I AM CHARGED WITH THE ASSAULT? THIS IS THE KEY ISSUE MY LAWYER HOPES TO RAISE IN OUR NEW TRIAL MOTION.
THE FAMILY EVEN FILED A FALSE REPORT SAYING I CHASED THE TEENAGE BOY HOME BACK IN 2011 THIS REPORT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED IN REVOKING MY BOND, MY WIFE AND I WERE AT THE HOSPITAL HAVING AN ULTRASOUND ON THAT DATE AND F.Y.I HE WAS RIDING A MOTORCYCLE IN THE REPORT AND I SUPPOSIDLY CHASED HIM ON FOOT?

**HERE IS THE NAME OF MY FORMER PARTNER BLAINE LEWIS HE TO KNOWS A LOT ABOUT ME 865-318-5244. KIM PIERCE 865-680-5482 HAS A LOT OF INFO TOO AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO YOU ALL.

 I CAN ALSO PROVIDE THE NAMES OF 2 OTHER DEPUTIES THAT KNOW ABOUT MY TRAFFIC STOP WHO WORKED THAT NIGHT TOO IF NEEDED.

**WE HAVE A SHORT TIME TO DO AN APPEAL 30 DAYS AFTER THE NEW TRIAL MOTION I AM HOPEFUL I GET A FREE LAWYER FOR THIS AND WE ARE TRYING TO GET THE TRANSCRIPTS FOR THE APPEAL UNDER THE INDIGENT STATUS IF I QUALIFY. WE HAD A FUND RAISER AND CAME UP EMPTY MANY PEOPLE HERE ARE NOT THAT WELL OFF AS I SAID I MADE $31K AFTER 10 YEARS OF SERVICE AND MISS IT TERRIBLY.

SO AS YOU CAN SEE IT IS RETALIATION FOR THE TRAFFIC STOP, IT IS HARD TO GET JUSTICE IN THIS COUNTY FOR ME DESPITE THE COVER UP.

REWARD INFO CAN BE PLACEDI N THE FOLLOWING PAPER MT PRESS (LOCAL PAPER) 865-428-0746

We than have:

From: Joseph Occhipinti <npdf1@aol.com>
To: LPOSNER@KINGWORLD.COM
Subject: Plight of former TN Deputy Sheriff Mark Lipton (Inside Edition Documentary Requested)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:14:58 -0400 (EDT)
Dear Larry:
As you know, I am the Executive Director of the National Police Defense Foundation (NPDF), a congressionally recognized and IRS designated 5-1 c 3 non-profit police organization that provides medical and legal support to law enforcement officials who have victimized. (www.npdf.org)
In 2012, I investigated the criminal prosecution of former Servier County (TN) Deputy Sheriff Mark Lipton who was convicted for an alleged assault involving his neighbor.
Our investigation disclosed convincing evidence that alleges Deputy Lipton was the target of a selective prosecution having been falsely convicted, which resulted in his dismissal as a law enforcement officer.
EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE
1.  The prosecution appears retaliatory after Lipton arrested the Sheriff's friend for DWI and refused to void the arrest.
2. Lipton had been cooperating with the FBI and providing intelligence on alleged corruption within that department.
3. The Sheriff is allegedly related to the alleged victim of the assault.
4. Lipton passed a polygraph showing he wasbeing  truthful that no assault occurred.
5. I personally spoke to the FBI agent who suspects his prosecution was retaliatory.
6. A forensic expert believes the evidence contradicts the victims court testimony involving the alleged assault. Moreover, all we need is simply court ordered DNA testing of the weapon which should confirm that the assault never occurred as alleged.
7. Two of the testiying witnesses were arrested yesterday for drug distributuion which gives you a sense of their background to frame a cop.
Unfortunately, MR. Lipton is indergent and has a court appointed attorney from the same county. Politics as usual. It appears his attorney is not effectively representing Lipton in the pending appeal.
I am hoping to profile his case on national TV and convince the Governor to conduct an independent review of the Lipton Prosecution. Also, to formally ask the FBI to conduct a civil rights and corruption investigation based in part of the testimony of the FBI agent.  
In addition, help raise much needed donations enabling Lipton to hire competent legal counsel to represent him.
Please know that the NPDF has over 180,000 members and supporters nationwide and using the media has been successful in the past in exposing many injustices against the police.
My direct number is 732-616-9600 to further discuss this great human interest case.  
Joseph Occhipinti
Founder & Executive Director

National Police Defense Foundation
21 Kilmer Drive, Bldg 2, Suite F
Morganville, New Jersey 07751
732-446-3360 (TEL)
732-862-1444 (FAX)

National Police Defense Foundation


21 Kilmer Drive
Bldg. 2, Suite F
Morganville, NJ 07751
WWW.NPDF.ORG

Press Release
Contact: Joseph Occhipinti
         Executive Director
    

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     09:00 A.M. EDT,
     June 12, 2012 
NPDF POSTS $5,000 REWARD TO HELP OVERTURN A FELONY CONVICTION FOR FORMER SEVIER cOUNTY dEPUTY sHERIFF MARK LIPTON

Morganville, NJ, June 12, 2012:  The National Police Defense Foundation (NPDF) announced today that the posting of a $5,000 reward for public information leading to the exoneration of Sevier County (TN)  Deputy Sheriff Mark Lipton who was convicted in March 2012 for felony assault for allegedly “pistol whipping” a neighbor.  

An independent NPDF investigation disclosed Deputy Lipton reportedly took lawful police action when he attempt to stop a neighbor’s relative who was operating at a high rate of speed a 4 X 4 vehicle that posed  imminent danger to a 3 year old child who was holding onto to the gas tank. As a result of the deputy’s intervention, an altercation occurred resulting in his alleged assault by his neighbor and relatives. The incident took place on November 16, 2009 in the vicinity of 1069 Bryan View Road, Sevierville, TN.

At trial, it appears Deputy Lipton was convicted upon the testimony of his neighbor without any independent testimony or scientific evidence (DNA) corroborating the alleged pistol whipping. A DNA test of the weapon was never conducted which could have proved if the alleged assault ever occurred.    
Deputy Lipton, a ten year veteran with an unblemished record, voluntarily submitted to a polygraph examination that was conducted by a former FBI Agent, which confirmed the deputy was being truthful that no assault ever occurred.

In an effort to help vindicate Deputy Lipton, a $5,000 reward is being offered for public information that exonerates the officer. Any person who has credible “newly discovered” evidence or witness testimony that results in the overturning of Deputy Lipton’s conviction is urged to contact 888-SAFE COP.

Deputy Lipton is planning to “appeal” his conviction, however, since he is unemployed and has a family of seven to support needs your financial assistance. Any person wishing to donate to the “Deputy Sheriff Mark Lipton Defense Fund” is urged to either send their tax-deductible donation to the NPDF, Post Office Box 318, Englishtown, NJ or call 732-617-2330 or go on line at WWW.NPDF.ORG.    

]